Back to news

UK Ministry of Defence rejects call to reopen UFO file review

The UK Ministry of Defence said it would not resume a dedicated UFO investigation program after a Scottish researcher sought a new review of released files and current reporting policy.

UK Ministry of Defence rejects call to reopen UFO file review
Aerial view of the UK Ministry of Defence Main Building by Allan House, MoD/Crown copyright 2017, localized from Wikimedia Commons under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

The UK Ministry of Defence has rejected a request to reopen a dedicated review of unidentified flying object reports, according to correspondence reported by Edinburgh Live on August 4. Scottish author and researcher Malcolm Robinson had asked the government to reconsider how it handles historical files and present-day reports, pointing to renewed public debate about unidentified anomalous phenomena in the United States.

The ministry's Air Policy Secretariat replied that no reported sighting examined over more than 50 years had indicated a military threat to the United Kingdom. It said the department stopped investigating UFO reports in 2009 and that files covering the period through that year had been transferred for public release through The National Archives.

The response did not say that unusual objects are ignored by air-defence authorities. The ministry said the United Kingdom continues to maintain a recognized air picture and monitors NATO airspace so that credible threats can be identified and addressed. That function is broader than a public UFO-reporting office and is focused on defence rather than cataloguing unexplained observations.

Robinson told Edinburgh Live that he considered the answer inadequate and intended to raise the issue with Prime Minister Andy Burnham. His request reflects a continuing disagreement over whether a threat-based military screen is sufficient for reports that may also involve aviation safety, scientific interest or public accountability.

The exchange changes policy context rather than the evidentiary status of any individual sighting. The ministry's position explains why it does not operate a dedicated UFO investigation unit, but it does not establish that every historical report was identified. A renewed review would therefore be a policy choice about transparency and scope, not evidence by itself for an extraordinary origin.