Global UFO Archive
English中文日本語PortuguêsFrançaisEspañol

United States / 2023 / EXPLAINED

2023 North American High-Altitude Object Shootdowns

From 10 to 12 February 2023, U.S. fighters shot down three small objects over Alaska, Yukon and Lake Huron after heightened radar scrutiny following the separate Chinese surveillance balloon. The first two were reported near 40,000 feet and the third near 20,000 feet. Officials cited aviation hazards and unresolved surveillance concerns. Initial searches ended without attributable debris. Canadian March emails later described shore material and a weather-equipment module, but expressly left the link to the Lake Huron target uncertain. A Yukon image became public in 2024 and official Lake Huron infrared footage in May 2026. These disclosures expand the evidence without confirming every model or owner. Biden’s February 2023 assessment favored private, recreational or research balloons rather than a link to China’s surveillance program. The archive retains its conventional explanation while distinguishing verified military operations from incomplete individual identification.

U.S. Air Force F-22 Raptor flying above snow-covered mountains near Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Alaska in February 2023
A 525th Fighter Squadron F-22 flies near Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson on 27 February 2023. This public-domain U.S. Air Force photograph provides Alaska and interceptor context; it was taken after the 10 February shootdown and does not show the mission or any of the three objects.Senior Airman Patrick Sullivan / U.S. Air Force via DVIDS
CredibilityB
StatusEXPLAINED
Evidence types5
Official sources12
Last reviewed2026
Archive assessment

This archive treats the case as explained or substantially resolved by conventional evidence.

Documentation
High documentation
Primary location
Northern Alaska, Yukon and Lake Huron
Source base
16 linked records
Research use
Comparison case

What the official record establishes

Confirmed operations
Official records confirm three radar-supported intercepts and shootdowns over Alaska, Yukon and Lake Huron from 10 to 12 February 2023.[2][3][5]
Separate from China balloon
The three small objects were not publicly linked to China's surveillance program. Unlike the Chinese balloon, none has publicly matched recovered debris.[1][7]
Detection change
NORAD adjusted radar settings after the Chinese balloon, making more slow-moving objects visible; officials found no evidence of a sudden increase in the sky.[1][4]
No matched debris
Initial searches found no attributable debris. Later shore material and a weather-equipment module were not publicly matched to the Lake Huron target.[7][4][14]
Best current assessment
Benign balloons or similar lightweight platforms are the leading assessment, but the exact model, owner and purpose of each object were not physically confirmed.[1][12]

Case dossier

Three small targets, a separate Chinese balloon

The three shootdowns must be separated from the Chinese surveillance balloon destroyed off South Carolina on 4 February 2023. That larger balloon had been tracked across North America, attributed by the United States to a Chinese surveillance program and substantially recovered. The later objects were smaller, encountered between 10 and 12 February, and were not publicly linked to that program. Grouping all four under one label obscures the most important evidentiary difference: investigators recovered and analyzed the Chinese balloon, but did not recover the Alaska, Yukon or Lake Huron objects. [1] · [7]

The Alaska interception

NORAD detected the first smaller object on ground radar on 9 February over northern Alaska. Fighters investigated it, and officials described it as roughly the size of a small car at about 40,000 feet, an altitude used by civilian aircraft. On 10 February, an F-22 from Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson fired an AIM-9X missile and brought it down over U.S. territorial water off Alaska's northern coast. The Pentagon said the immediate reason was the reasonable hazard to civil flight. At that stage it had no public description of the object's capabilities, purpose or origin. [2]

The Yukon operation

The second object was detected over Alaska late on 10 February and tracked as it crossed into Canadian airspace. U.S. F-22s followed it, while Canadian CF-18 fighters and a CP-140 patrol aircraft joined the response. After consultation between President Biden and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, an American F-22 shot it down over Yukon on 11 February. Canadian officials described a small cylindrical object near 40,000 feet. Anand described this as the first airborne-object shootdown by a NORAD operation, but that operational milestone did not establish what the object was. [3] · [8]

Lake Huron and the uncertain earlier track

The Lake Huron account includes a radar contact near Montana on 11 February. Fighters searched after dark without finding it, and radar operators lost the track. VanHerck described the later intermittent Wisconsin contact as likely, but not confirmed, to be the same target. The object subsequently tracked through Michigan on 12 February was near 20,000 feet and raised aviation and security concerns. An F-16 fired two AIM-9X missiles: the first missed and fell harmlessly into the lake; the second struck the target. Milley confirmed this correction on 14 February. Neither the successful engagement nor the probable track association identifies a model or owner. [5] · [6]

What changed in radar detection

The apparent wave was partly a change in detection practice. After the Chinese balloon crossed the continent, NORAD enhanced and narrowed radar settings to pick up more slow-moving objects. President Biden later said there was no evidence of a sudden increase in the number of objects in the sky; authorities were seeing more partly because radar scrutiny had changed. That does not make the three tracks imaginary. It explains why small objects that might previously have been filtered out or monitored differently appeared within three days and received national attention. [1] · [4]

Descriptions and later visual records

The initial public descriptions were provisional, not technical identifications. Officials compared the Alaska object with a small car, called the Yukon object cylindrical and described the Lake Huron target as a structure with possible strings or a payload. The public visual record later expanded: a Yukon image appeared through an information request and a Lake Huron infrared clip entered the official release archive. Their dates, provenance and limitations must be read individually; neither is a complete radar-and-cockpit record for all three encounters. News illustrations remain distinct from these released records. [2] · [5] · [12] · [13]

The Yukon image and its release correspondence

The Yukon visual record changed when an access-to-information package was published in September 2024. Its page 11 contains a degraded image, not a detailed engineering view. A February 11 email on page 1 describes a cylindrical object with a metallic upper quarter, a white remainder and a roughly 20-foot line carrying a package. That is a reported visual description, not a material analysis. On page 5, February 15 correspondence warns that publishing the image might increase confusion despite statements that the object was benign. This documents an internal publication discussion; it neither establishes an extraordinary shape from the grainy image nor identifies the owner. [13] PDF pp. 1, 5, 11 · [16]

The 2026 Lake Huron video release

On 22 May 2026, the Pentagon published the 46-second record DOW-UAP-PR071 through PURSUE and DVIDS. The listing gives 12 February 2023 as the recording date; publication in 2026 is not a new shootdown. Its description places sensor focus at about 11 seconds and fragmentation at about 20 seconds, while explicitly withholding an analytical conclusion from that description. AARO describes the title as uploader-defined, assesses a likely military infrared origin and notes a February 2023 classified-network upload amid chain-of-custody limitations. The War Zone separately reported Pentagon confirmation that it depicts the Lake Huron engagement. These records supersede a blanket claim that no target video is public, without establishing a manufacturer, owner or complete sensor history. [12] · [15]

When the initial searches ended

The initial recovery operations failed to locate attributable debris. Canadian teams searched the Yukon area until 17 February, when severe winter conditions and the falling probability of recovery ended the effort. U.S. Northern Command also concluded searches near Deadhorse, Alaska, and in Lake Huron after airborne, surface and subsurface work found no debris. Arctic sea ice, weather, remote terrain and deep water constrained the operations. Because nothing attributable to the three targets entered a public chain of custody, later claims that any one object was definitively a hobby balloon, weather device or surveillance platform remain assessments rather than recovered-hardware identifications. [7] · [4] · [9]

Debris on the shore, without a confirmed match

The February search outcome should not erase later debris reports. In a 13 March 2023 email released through Canadian access-to-information records, an RCMP official said the force held material and a module found on Lake Huron’s shore the previous week. The module was associated with a weather-equipment company, but its connection to the shootdown was expressly uncertain and further analysis was planned. A March 14 update repeats that limitation. This is evidence that shore material was collected, not a documented match to the airborne target. A complete identification would require the missing association and examination results, rather than simply substituting a familiar weather-device label. [14] PDF pp. 1, 8

A conventional assessment with unresolved ownership

On 16 February, Biden said the intelligence community's current assessment was that the three objects were most likely balloons connected to private companies, recreation, weather work or scientific research. He also said nothing then suggested a connection to China's surveillance-balloon program or surveillance vehicles from another country. This was the central public conventional assessment in February 2023, but its wording matters: most likely is not a recovered-item identification. The case belongs in a UAP archive because it shows how a genuine unidentified-airspace problem can trigger military action while remaining compatible with ordinary technology and incomplete public evidence. [1] · [12]

Official file · Department of War / DVIDS

Official Lake Huron video record

DVIDS published DOW-UAP-PR071 on 22 May 2026, with a recording date of 12 February 2023 and duration of 46 seconds. Read its source and interpretation cautions alongside the footage; it does not identify an owner.

Open the official video and record

Related video

White House briefing coverage after the North American shootdownsNBC News / YouTubeOpen source video

Related checks and records

Timeline

  • A U.S. F-22 shoots down the separately identified Chinese surveillance balloon off South Carolina; substantial debris is later recovered.
  • NORAD detects a small object on ground radar over northern Alaska and sends fighters to investigate.
  • An F-22 fires an AIM-9X and downs the Alaska object over U.S. territorial water after officials cite a civil-aviation hazard.
  • A second object is detected over Alaska, followed into Canadian airspace and tracked jointly by U.S. and Canadian aircraft.
  • After Biden-Trudeau consultation, a U.S. F-22 shoots down the cylindrical Yukon object near 40,000 feet.
  • A radar contact appears near Montana; a night search does not visually locate it and the track later becomes intermittent.
  • A target is tracked over the Great Lakes; its association with the earlier Montana contact is considered likely, not confirmed. An F-16’s first missile misses and the second downs it over Lake Huron.
  • General Mark Milley publicly confirms that the first Lake Huron missile missed and landed harmlessly in the water.
  • Biden says the objects were most likely benign balloons and that increased radar scrutiny helped produce the cluster of detections.
  • Canadian and U.S. authorities end the Yukon, Alaska and Lake Huron recovery efforts without locating attributable debris.
  • An RCMP email records shore debris and a weather-equipment module, with no confirmed link to the Lake Huron target.
  • CTV News publishes the Yukon image and accompanying information-request records.
  • PURSUE and DVIDS publish the 46-second Lake Huron record DOW-UAP-PR071 with provenance and interpretation limits.

Frequently asked questions

Did the 2023 high-altitude object shootdowns really happen?

Yes. U.S. and Canadian official records document radar detections, fighter missions and three shootdowns over Alaska, Yukon and Lake Huron.

Were the objects extraterrestrial craft?

No public evidence supports that conclusion. The White House said the leading assessment was benign balloons connected to private, recreational or research activity.

Were they Chinese spy balloons?

Officials said they had no evidence connecting the three smaller objects to China's surveillance-balloon program or another country's surveillance fleet.

Why were the objects shot down?

They were unidentified, operated at altitudes used by civilian aircraft and could not immediately be cleared of a surveillance risk. Officials chose locations where the engagements could be conducted more safely.

What did the pilots see?

Initial descriptions varied. A Yukon image was published in 2024 and DOW-UAP-PR071, a 46-second Lake Huron infrared record, in May 2026. Their provenance limits and partial coverage do not establish every object’s model or owner.

Was any debris recovered?

Initial searches ended on 17 February without attributable debris. March Canadian emails report shore material and a weather-equipment module, but explicitly leave its connection to the Lake Huron shootdown unconfirmed.

Why did three detections occur in three days?

After the Chinese balloon, NORAD changed radar settings to detect more slow-moving objects. Officials said the cluster reflected increased scrutiny, not evidence of a sudden increase in objects.

Sources

The main image is a U.S. Air Force photograph of an F-22 assigned to the 525th Fighter Squadron flying near Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson on 27 February 2023. DVIDS marks it public domain. It illustrates the Alaska location and interceptor type but was taken after the shootdown and does not show the mission or any of the three objects. The NBC News video is later briefing coverage, not original target footage.