Canada / 1967 / INSUFFICIENT DATA
1967 Duhamel UFO landing marks
On 5 August 1967, farmer Edgar Schielke found four circular or elliptical tracks in pasture near Duhamel, Alberta, after heavy rain. No one reported seeing a craft make the marks. A Defence Research Establishment Suffield scientist inspected the site on 11 August and produced Memorandum 49/67, which documented the traces but did not determine their cause.

This case has insufficient public data for a strong conclusion.
- Documentation
- High documentation
- Primary location
- Duhamel, Alberta
- Source base
- 3 linked records
- Research use
- Comparison case
Case dossier
What happened: The first roughly thirty-foot ring was discovered on 5 August, with three additional marks identified nearby. The official inspector measured rings from about 31 feet 9 inches to an ellipse roughly 34 feet 5 inches by 36 feet 3 inches, with flattened or discoloured bands several inches wide.
Witness accounts and timeline: Schielke was a discoverer of the marks, not an eyewitness to a landing. The inspection team reached the site on 11 August with military and local participants, documented conditions and collected samples. This distinction prevents the ground traces from being presented as a witnessed UFO event.
Evidence analysis: The report found crushed or discoloured grass but no exhaust pattern, scorching, broad disturbance outside the rings or abnormal background radiation. It considered rolling or mechanical contact and the possibility of a hoax, while noting that deliberate construction could require effort and equipment.
Official background: Library and Archives Canada preserves the report within Canada's historical UFO records. Memorandum 49/67 is valuable because it records measurements and negative findings rather than relying on newspaper retellings.
Possible explanations and careful assessment: Mechanical creation, agricultural activity, human fabrication and less obvious natural processes remain possible. Because no craft was observed and the physical findings were non-diagnostic, the archive classifies the cause as insufficient data rather than an unresolved vehicle sighting.
Why this case belongs in the archive: Duhamel is a strong example of an official physical-trace investigation that did not produce an extraordinary conclusion. It helps readers distinguish a documented unexplained mark from evidence that a UFO landed.
Timeline
- Heavy rain affects the pasture near Duhamel.
- Edgar Schielke discovers the first ring and three additional marks are identified.
- A Defence Research Establishment Suffield scientist inspects and measures the site.
- Suffield Memorandum 49/67 records findings without a conclusive cause.
Evidence matrix
Evidence assessment
The official measurements and negative tests make this more than a folklore account. The evidence remains non-diagnostic: no landing was witnessed, radiation was normal and the grass patterns do not uniquely identify how they were made.
Official context
Canada's official archive preserves an onsite defence-research inspection. The memorandum explicitly documents uncertainty and does not verify a UFO landing.
Skeptical notes
Any analysis should begin with mechanical, agricultural and human construction scenarios. The difficulty of a proposed method is not proof that an extraordinary craft created the rings.
Sources
- Official fileOnsite inspection of reputed UFO landing marks at Duhamel, AlbertaLibrary and Archives Canada
- Official fileCanada's historical UFO recordsLibrary and Archives Canadahttps://www.canada.ca/en/library-archives/collection/research-help/science-technology/ufos.html
- ArchiveTranscript and mirror of the Duhamel inspection reportThe Experiencer Support Associationhttps://www.experiencersupport.org/declassified/onsite-inspection-of-ufo-landing-marks-at-duhamel-camrose-county-in-alberta
